| 摘要: |
| 通过对过去两年《本科教学质量报告》文本的研读，选择七所“985工程”大学的教学质量报告，从模式到内容进行了比较。分析发现：2011年的报告较2010年有所改善，但主体内容仍显薄弱；应付观望和掩饰问题的呈现方式尚属主流；质量辨析依旧缺乏理性深度。真正的教学质量报告尚待时日。 |
| 关键词: 985高校 质量报告 文本分析 |
| DOI： |
| Received:December 30, 2012Revised:February 22, 2013 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Where Is the Real Undergraduate Teaching Quality Report?—An Analysis of Annual Teaching studying Quality Reports of Seven “985 Project” Universities |
| Dong Yunchuan1,Xu Juan2 |
| (1.Institute of Higher Education Research;2.Institute of Marx’s Research, Yunnan University, Kunming，Yunnan 650091) |
| Abstract: |
| This paper reviews Annual Teaching studying Quality Reports issued respectively by seven “985 Project” universities, and compares the versions of 2010 and 2011 from the construction and contents of these reports. It is found that, in general, the quality of the versions of 2011 is better than that of 2010, but the main contents are still insufficient. The main shortage of most reports is still to watch and conceal existed problems, and also the analysis of the teaching studying quality lacks of rational deepness. Thus, a real annual report is yet still expected. |
| Key words: “985 Project”universities Quality report Text analysis |
